An Evaluability assessment of residential programs for young offenders in the Waterloo area
Read Online
Share

An Evaluability assessment of residential programs for young offenders in the Waterloo area by Stephen Mark Pancer

  • 433 Want to read
  • ·
  • 71 Currently reading

Published by Centre for Social Welfare Studies, Faculty of Social Work, Wilfrid Laurier University in Waterloo, Ont .
Written in English

Subjects:

  • Juvenile detention homes -- Evaluation -- Ontario.,
  • Juvenile delinquents -- Ontario -- Waterloo Region.

Book details:

Edition Notes

StatementS. M. Pancer, K. U. Millar and M. C. Heide.
SeriesCentre for Social Welfare Studies (Series) -- no. 4
ContributionsMillar, K. U., Heide, M. C.
Classifications
LC ClassificationsHV"9109"O5"P35"1988
The Physical Object
Pagination101 l.
Number of Pages101
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL20046276M

Download An Evaluability assessment of residential programs for young offenders in the Waterloo area

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

  No specifications concerning the program setting were made, because residential treatment of young offenders takes place in various facilities (e.g., youth prisons, institutions within the welfare and youth care system, psychiatric units, and reform schools for young Cited by: Area Served: Waterloo Regional Municipality 16 - 24 years Add to Info Cart Ray of Hope’s Youth Reintegration Program assists young men and women in their transition back into the community. Local resource book for those living, working or supporting someone with a . An evaluability assessment of the Child Protection Mediation Pilot Project / by Daphne Penrose. HV W56 P45 For our children: programmes for their care and development in Colombia / Ellen Tolmie, photography ; Benjamin Villegas, editor. A significant challenge facing the juvenile justice system is the task of transitioning and reintegrating juveniles from youth corrections facilities back into the community. This challenge, in part, is related to determining whether the referred community programs are effective. This article summarizes the literature on the effectiveness of community programs for juveniles involved in the.

Treatment programs for sex offenders should include protocols for baseline assessment, progress evaluation, risk assessment, and discharge. On the basis of data obtained from these protocols, informed judgments can be made about differential prognosis, especially in the area of risk assessment.   Based on an extensive review of the ‘what works’ literature, Lösel (, pp. 33–34) lists principles or characteristics of effective programs, many of which have been confirmed in meta-analyses; (1) Theoretically sound conceptualization of program and evaluation, (2) Dynamic assessment of the offender's risk, (3) Intensive service for. 8, 14 Long-term assessments of school-based smoking prevention programs have found programs based on providing young 9 An evaluability assessment clarifi es program we draw on a book .   JUVENILE JUSTICE / A new approach to help young offenders / County programs try to keep youths away from violent prisons James Sterngold, .

These residential programs differ in purpose and in their services, controls, goals, and objectives. This literature review provides information on the different types of residential programs available to youth in the juvenile justice system, including secure long-term facilities, residential treatment centers, wilderness camps, and shelter care. The Roundtable Program is a unique, psychiatric residential treatment program for adolescent male sex offenders, ages 12 to Our program is based on cognitive behavioral therapy practices, led and administered by a Program Director, Social Worker, and a team of therapists who are all Certified Sexual Offender Treatment Specialists. (by telephone) the directors of the best programs and followed up with site visits and an assessment report.2 Who is involved Originally, four States—Colorado, Nevada, Virginia, and New Jersey—participated in the project. Currently, boys are enrolled in the program: 72 in Colorado, 87 in Nevada, 68 in New Jersey, and 66 in Virginia. Carol Zimmerman, Gina Hendrix, James Moeser, and David Roush, eds., The Desktop Guide to Reentry for Juvenile Confinement Facilities, (Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, ).. Rudy Estrada and Jody Marksamer, "The Legal Rights of LGBT Youth in State Custody: What Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice Professionals Need to Know,” Child Welf no. .